Injerto dermo-epidérmico como tratamiento del siliconoma de extremidad inferior / Dermoepidermal graft as treatment of lower extremity siliconoma

Resumen Introducción A pesar de la evidencia sobre los malos resultados y riesgos del uso de inyecciones subcutáneas de silicona para mejorar el contorno corporal, esta técnica sigue siendo utilizada por personas no calificadas. Caso clínico Paciente de 56 años quien consultó por cuadro de celulitis en pierna izquierda. Se obtuvo el antecedente de intervención con silicona en cara, dorso de las manos, glúteos y piernas el año 2000. El cuadro progresó con múltiples abscesos en la totalidad de la pierna y sepsis. Se realizaron aseos quirúrgicos exponiendo planos fascial y muscular, se utilizó terapia local con sistemas de presión negativa y posterior injerto dermo-epidérmico (IDE). El manejo multidisciplinario se realizó en unidades críticas. Los resultados del manejo fueron satisfactorios, salvando la extremidad con cobertura total, logrando el alta luego de 4 meses. Conclusión A pesar de conocerse los peligros de la inyección de silicona, este sigue siendo un procedimiento frecuente. En nuestra paciente se manifestó como fascitis de la pierna, requiriendo tratamiento quirúrgico agresivo. Conocer esta entidad, su diagnóstico y tratamiento es fundamental para tratar pacientes con complicaciones graves.

Introduction Despite the evidence of poor performance and risks of using silicone subcutaneous injections to improve body contour, this technique is still used by untrained people, generating an iatrogenic entity with serious complications. Case report 56 year old female presented left lower extremity cellulitis. A history of previous intervention with silicone injections in face, back of hands, buttocks and legs in year 2000 was obtained. An inflammatory process progressed locally and systemically with multiple abscesses, subcutaneous thickness in the entire leg and sepsis, requiring multiple surgical procedures, reaching fascial and muscle planes exposition of the left leg. The patient underwent local therapy with negative pressure systems and subsequent dermoepidermal graft. Multidisciplinary management was performed on a critical unit. The results were satisfactory, preserving the limb with full coverage. She was discharged after four months of inpatient management. Conclusion Despite knowing the risks of silicone injection (industrial or medical) it remains a common procedure. In our patient she presented as leg fasciitis, requiring aggressive surgical treatment. Knowing this entity, its diagnosis and treatment is essential to treat patients with serious complications.

Biocompatibility of sealers used in apical surgery: a histological study in rat subcutaneous tissue

The aim of this study was to evaluate the biocompatibility of sealers used in apical surgery in rat subcutaneous tissue. Sterile polyethylene tubes were filled with the following sealers: Sealapex, Sealapex with addition of zinc oxide, Sealer 26, Sealer 26 with thicker consistency (greater powder-to-resin ratio) and White MTA. The tubes were implanted in the dorsum of male rats and after 7, 21 and 42 days, the animals were killed, obtaining 5 specimens for each sealer in each evaluation period. The lateral surface of the tube was used as negative control. The inflammatory reaction to contact with the sealers was classified as absent, mild, moderate and severe. At 7 days, all sealers caused similar inflammatory reactions in the connective tissue of the animals, with most specimens presenting a moderate to intense chronic inflammatory reaction, with presence of multinucleated giant cells. At 21 days, Sealer 26 and Sealer 26 with thicker consistency presented more intense inflammatory reaction (p=0.004), whereas after 42 days, the inflammatory reaction ranged from absent to mild with statistically similar results for both materials (p=0.08). Except for MTA, all sealers presented foreign-body granulomatous reaction at 42 days. All sealers but Sealapex presented a statistically significant decrease of the inflammatory reaction over time. In conclusion, all sealers caused moderate to severe inflammation in the earlier evaluation period. However, Sealer 26 and Sealer 26 with thicker consistency caused more intense inflammatory reactions after 21 days of contact with the tissues and no granulomatous reaction was observed for MTA at the final period of analysis.

O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a biocompatibilidade de cimentos utilizados em cirurgia apical, em tecidos subcutâneos de ratos. Tubos de polietileno esterilizados foram preenchidos com os seguintes cimentos: Sealapex, Sealapex acrescido de óxido de zinco, Sealer 26, Sealer 26 espessado (maior proporção pó:resina) e MTA branco. Os tubos foram implantados no dorso de ratos machos e após 7, 21 e 42 dias, os animais foram mortos, obtendo 5 amostras por cimento em cada período analisado. A superfície lateral do tubo foi utilizada como controle negativo. A reação inflamatória em contato com os cimentos foram classificadas como ausente, leve, moderada e severa. Aos 7 dias, todos os cimentos induziram reações inflamatórias similares no tecido conjuntivo dos animais, com a maioria dos espécimes apresentando reação inflamatória crônica de moderada a intensa, com presença de células gigantes multinucleadas. Aos 21 dias, Sealer 26 e Sealer 26 espessado apresentaram reação inflamatória mais intensa (p=0,004), enquanto após 42 dias, a reação inflamatória variou de ausente a leve, com resultados estatisticamente semelhantes para ambos materiais (p=0,08). Com exceção do grupo MTA, todos os cimentos apresentavam reação granulomatosa de corpo estranho após 42 dias. Todos os grupos, exceto o Sealapex, apresentaram redução estatisticamente significante dos índices inflamatórios ao longo do tempo. Conclui-se que todos os cimentos induziram reação inflamatória de moderada a intensa no período inicial de análise. Entretanto, Sealer 26 e Sealer 26 espessado apresentaram reação inflamatória mais intensa após 21 dias de contato com os tecidos e reação granulomatosa não foi observada no grupo MTA no período final de análise.

Comparison of the biocompatibility of different root canal irrigants

The purpose of this study was to compare the reaction of rat subcutaneous connective tissue to 0.9 percent sterile saline, 2.5 percent sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), 5.25 percent NaOCl and 2 percent chlorhexidine gluconate solution or gel. Six circles were demarcated on the dorsal skin of 24 male Wistar rats, leaving 2 cm between each circle. Using a syringe, 0.1 mL of each root canal irrigant was injected subcutaneously into 5 circles. In the 6th circle, the needle of an empty syringe was introduced into the skin, but no irrigant was injected (control group). Evaluations were undertaken at 2 h, 48 h, 14 days and 30 days post-procedure. Tissue samples were excised, embedded in paraffin blocks and 3-µm-thick sections were obtained and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. The areas of inflammatory reaction were evaluated and analyzed statistically by ANOVA and Tukey's test. The control group showed few or no inflammatory reaction areas in the subcutaneous tissue. 0.9 percent saline solution, 2.0 percent chlorhexidine solution and 2.5 percent NaOCl showed a good biocompatibility, as very mild inflammatory reaction was detected at 14 days and tissue repair occurred at 30 days. 5.25 percent NaOCl was the most toxic irrigant, as the number of inflammatory cells remained elevated at 14 and 30 days. The group treated with 2.0 percent chlorhexidine gluconate gel presented a moderate inflammatory response at 14 days, which decreased at 30 days, being considered similar to that of the control group, 0.9 percent saline solution, 2.0 percent chlorhexidine solution and 2.5 percent NaOCl at this experimental period.